ISSN 1000-3665 CN 11-2202/P

    区域地下水水化学背景值研究现状及发展趋势

    Advances and emerging perspectives in regional groundwater hydrochemical background levels

    • 摘要: 地下水水化学背景值是识别地下水污染和天然劣质地下水的重要依据,是水文地质、污染水文地质及生态水文地质的一项重要基础工作。本文系统梳理了地下水水化学背景值概念内涵与评估框架,分析了背景值确定过程中的关键问题,探讨了结果合理性评价方法,并指出未来值得探索的新方向。地下水水化学背景值不同于传统“自然背景水平”,既反映自然环境控制下的水化学特征,也包含长期人类活动影响痕迹。统计单元划分、采样点布设及异常识别方法筛选是背景值确定的重要环节。统计单元可在水文地质分区基础上结合水文地球化学特征进行优化,但缺乏统一评价标准;采样点布设合理性评价包括空间均衡性分析和最小样本量检验,但相关研究有待进一步完善。异常识别方法包括预选法、数理统计法、水文地球化学法和影响因素法,各类方法具有不同适用条件,多方法耦合有助于提高识别稳健性和可靠性,但针对不同区域建立统一评估体系较为困难,且微量组分异常识别仍是难点。水化学背景值合理性评价包括异常值成因判别和背景值形成机制解释,但目前异常成因判别多为定性研究且存在较大不确定性。未来研究需推动统计单元划分与采样设计的量化评价,建立适用于不同水文地质条件的背景值评估体系,加强机器学习在异常识别中的应用,并促进多源信息融合技术的发展。

       

      Abstract: Groundwater Hydrochemical Background Levels (GHBLs) are recognized as a fundamental tool for identifying groundwater contamination and have been widely applied in research on hydrogeology, contaminated hydrogeology, and eco-hydrogeology. This paper systematically reviews the conceptual basis and assessment framework of GHBLs, summarizes key issues in their determination, evaluates approaches for assessing result reliability, and highlights future research directions. Unlike traditional “natural background levels,” GHBLs reflect not only hydrochemical characteristics governed by natural processes but also the legacy effects of long-term anthropogenic activities. The determination of GHBLs generally involves three critical stages: statistical unit delineation, sampling design, and anomaly identification. Statistical units are commonly established based on hydrogeological zoning and may be further refined using hydrogeochemical characteristics; however, standardized quantitative criteria for delineation remain lacking. Sampling design is mainly assessed in terms of spatial representativeness and minimum sample size, although related methodological studies remain limited. Existing anomaly identification methods include preselection, statistical, hydrogeochemical, and influencing-factor-based approaches, each with its own strengths and limitations. Combining multiple methods can improve the robustness and reliability of anomaly identification. However, establishing a unified framework applicable across different regions remains challenging, and anomaly identification for trace constituents is still difficult. Current validation of GHBL rationality mainly relies on interpreting anomaly sources and identifying hydrogeochemical controls, yet anomaly attribution remains largely qualitative and subject to uncertainty. Future research should strengthen the quantitative evaluation of statistical-unit delineation and sampling design, develop assessment frameworks adaptable to different hydrogeological settings, expand the application of machine learning in anomaly identification, and promote multi-source data integration.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回