ISSN 1000-3665 CN 11-2202/P

    格尔木河流域地下水开发利用的生态风险分析

    Ecological risk analysis of groundwater abstraction in the Golmud river basin

    • 摘要: 格尔木河流域是西北典型的干旱内流河流域,地下水是植被生态与城镇供水的重要水源,探究流域基于地下水开采可能导致的生态风险以及协调地下水开发与植被生态用水,对地下水开发中保护脆弱的生态环境具有重要的理论和现实意义。为了预测格尔木河流域生态系统在不同地下水开发情境下可能存在的风险,采用地下水流数值模拟方法,以河道生态需水量和优势植被适生地下水埋深为评价指标,分析了现状开采以及规划开采情景下存在的生态风险。研究结果表明:(1)芦草、柽柳、罗布麻、白刺的适生水位埋深区间分别为0.2~3.5 m、1.0~5.0 m、1.0~4.0 m、1.0~3.3 m,最优埋深依次约为1.2,2.0,2.6,1.8 m,植被适宜生长的最大地下水埋深阈值为5.0m,格尔木河流域河道生态需水量为3.53×108 m3/a;(2)现状开采(1.43×108 m3/a)时,研究区河道剩余水量4.80×108 m3/a,采补基本平衡,可满足生态需水,规划开采条件下(2.55×108 m3/a),不同水文年的河道剩余水量均能满足生态需水;(3)不同水文年的生态影响主要集中在芦草集中分布区,北部植被分布区基本不受影响。本研究确定了不同情景下可能的生态风险的范围以及程度,为风险管控区的划分以及流域地下水资源合理开发与生态保护政策提供支撑,为西北内陆植被依赖地下水地区生态风险研究提供借鉴。

       

      Abstract: The Golmud river basin is a typical arid inland river basin in the northwest of China. Groundwater serves as an important water source for both dominant vegetation ecosystems and urban water supply. Balancing the groundwater exploitation and vegetation ecological water demand holds significant theoretical and practical importance for protecting the fragile ecological environment during groundwater exploitation. To evaluate the potential ecological risk of the ecosystem in the Golmud river basin under different hydrological scenarios, a groundwater flow numerical model was developed. The ecological risks under current and planned groundwater abstraction scenarios were evaluated using a dual-indicator framework incorporating river ecological water demand and suitable groundwater table depth thresholds for dominant vegetation species. The suitable groundwater depth ranges for Phragmites australis, Tamarix chinensis, Apocynum venetum, and Nitraria tangutorum are 0.2–3.5 m, 1.0–5.0 m, 1.0–4.0 m, and 1.0–3.3 m, respectively, with optimal groundwater depths of approximately 1.2, 2.0, 2.6, and 1.8 m. The maximum groundwater depth threshold required for sustainable vegetation growth was determined to be 5.0 m, while the ecological water demand of the Golmud River was estimated to be 3.53×108 m3/a. Under the current groundwater abstraction scenario (1.43×108 m3/a), the remaining river water volume was 4.80×108 m3/a, indicating a near balance between groundwater withdrawal and recharge and sufficient water availability to meet ecological demands. Under the planned abstraction scenario (2.55×108 m3/a), the remaining river water volume in different hydrological years could still satisfy the ecological water demand. The ecological impacts under different hydrological conditions were mainly concentrated in the areas dominated by Phragmites australis, whereas vegetation distributed in the northern part of the basin was minimally affected. This study determines the scope and extent of potential ecological risks under different scenarios, providing support for the delineation of risk management zones and the formulation of policies for rational groundwater exploitation and ecological protection in the catchment. It also offers insights for research on ecological risks in areas of northwestern China where vegetation relies on groundwater.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回