[1]卓万生.冲洪积卵石土层分布区滑坡形成机理分析HT4H——以安溪县某安置区边坡为例[J].水文地质工程地质,2020,47(2):169-177.[doi:10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.201908048]
 ZHUO Wansheng.Mechanism of landslides in the alluvial pebble layer distribution area:a case study of the landslope in a resettlement area in Anxi County[J].Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2020,47(2):169-177.[doi:10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.201908048]
点击复制

冲洪积卵石土层分布区滑坡形成机理分析HT4H——以安溪县某安置区边坡为例()
分享到:

《水文地质工程地质》[ISSN:1000-3665/CN:11-2202/P]

卷:
47卷
期数:
2020年2期
页码:
169-177
栏目:
环境地质
出版日期:
2020-03-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Mechanism of landslides in the alluvial pebble layer distribution area:a case study of the landslope in a resettlement area in Anxi County
作者:
卓万生12
1.福建省安溪县地质灾害研究所,福建 安溪362400;2.福州大学安溪地质灾害防治研究生工作站,福建 安溪362400
Author(s):
ZHUO Wansheng12
1.Anxi Geo-hazard Office, Anxi, Fujian362400, China;2.Graduate Workstation of Geological Disaster Prevention, Fuzhuo University, Anxi, Fujian362400,China
关键词:
冲洪积卵石土层渗流滑坡U形管导水盲沟盲管
Keywords:
alluvial pebble layer seepage landslide U-shaped tube water guide blind drainage ditch
分类号:
TV139.14;P642.22
DOI:
10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.201908048
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
地下水渗流是冲洪积卵石土层分布区发生滑坡的主控因素。安溪县某安置区的北侧边坡就是处于这种地质环境并受此影响,自2010年6月以来变形持续加剧、范围逐年扩展。目前,滑坡后缘整体下错达1.5 m,坡体纵横裂缝密布,前缘挡墙鼓出,坡体正处于强变形阶段。文章以此为例,着重讨论冲洪积卵石土层分布区形成滑坡的工程地质条件、水文地质条件及变形破坏特征,分析变形破坏的控制因素和滑坡形成机理,预测滑坡的稳定性。结果表明:冲洪积卵石土层形成的渗流系统,在充沛、多源的地下水补给等因素作用下,也会导致高差小、坡度缓的边坡发生严重地质灾害;基于现状水位,采取工程措施后,将坡体地下水位再降低4 m,稳定性系数将由原先的0.987~1.048提高至1.298~1.388,边坡可达到稳定状态。针对致灾成灾的主控因素和稳定性验算结果,提出采用“盲沟盲管排水+定向敷管导水+竖井”为治水止滑的主措施。本文研究是对地下水渗流控制型滑坡治理方法的有益探索和挑战,可为类似滑坡机理研究提供有益的参考借鉴。
Abstract:
Groundwater seepage is the main controlling factor for the deformation and failure of landslides in a cobble layer. Since June in 2010, the slope of a resettlement area in Anxi has shown signs of deformation and failure many times, and the scale and scope expands year by year. At present, the trailing edge of the landslide is staggered by 1.5 m as a whole, the slope is densely covered with vertical and horizontal cracks, and the slope is in a strong deformation stage. As an example, this study focuses on discussing the characteristics of landslide and deformation and failure characteristics of the cobble layer. The control factors and disaster mechanism of deformation and failure are analyzed to predict the stability of the landslide. By taking investigations and engineering surveys, the hydrogeology, stratigraphic lithology and the material compositions of the landslide are figured out. The results shows that the alluvial cobble layer and the developed seepage system, together with the multi-source recharge of groundwater, can also lead to serious geological disasters on slopes with small height differences and gentle slopes. The groundwater level of the slope is 4 m lower than the current level, and the stability coefficient has increased from 0.987~1.048 to 1.298~1.388, reaching a stable state. The measures of using blind drainage ditch to control water are also put forward. This research is a useful exploration and challenge to the control methods of this kind of groundwater seepage, and it is also expected to provide useful reference for similar landslide researched.

参考文献/References:

[1]杨珊妮. 东南沿海地区地质灾害易发性评价方法研究—以福建省为例[D]. 北京:北京交通大学,2016.
[YANG S N. The evaluation of geological susceptibility in the Southeast area—taking Fujian Province for an example [D]. Beijing:Beijing Jiaotong University,2016.(in Chinese)]
[2]叶龙珍. 福建省安溪县地质灾害发育特征及影响因素分析[J]. 地质灾害与环境保护,2011,22(2):46-49.
[YE L Z. Characteristics of geo-hazard and their influence factors in Anxi,Fujian Province[J]. Journal of Geological Hazards and Environment Preservation, 2011,22(2): 46-49.(in Chinese)]
[3]周云涛,陈洪凯,张勇. 超孔隙水压诱发特大型近水平崩坡积层滑坡破坏研究[J]. 工程地质学报, 2016, 24(5):732-740.
[ZHOU Y T,CHEN H K,ZHANG Y. Failure of super-huge landslide in collapsed debris deposits with nearly horizontal sliding surface induced by excess pore water pressure [J]. Journal of Engineering Geology,2016,24(5):732-740.(in Chinese)]
[4]陈志超,罗旋,柳侃. 碎石土滑坡渗流系统特征及防治措施研究[J].岩土力学, 2016,37(3): 813-819.
[CHEN Z C,LUO X,LIU K. Seepage characteristics and mitigation measures of a gravel soil landslide [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2016,37(3): 813-819.(in Chinese)]
[5]尹小涛,王水林,马双科. 强度变化对崩坡积体堆积机制及稳定性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学,2010,31(2): 620-626.[YIN X T,WANG S L,MA S k. Study of stability and accumulation mechanism of colluviums affected by change of strength property [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010,31(2): 620-626.(in Chinese)]
[6]陈善雄,许锡昌,徐海滨. 降雨型堆积层滑坡特征及稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学,2005,26(增刊2): 6-10.
[CHEN S X,XU X C,XU H B. Features and stability of rain-fall-induced colluvial landslides [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2005,26(Sup2): 6-10.(in Chinese)][7]刘磊,徐勇,李远耀,等.湘西陈溪峪滑坡变形机理及稳定性评价[J].水文地质工程地质,2019,46(2):21-28.
[LIU L,XU Y, LI Y Y,et al.A study of deformation mechanism and stability evaluation of the Chenxiyu landslide in western Hunan[J].Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2019,46(2):21-28.(in Chinese)]
[8]李玉峰,马强,李显平. 降雨诱发碎石土斜坡优先流机理研究[J]. 水电能源科学,2009,27(6): 56-59.
[LI Y F,MA Q,LI X P. Study on rain-induced gravel slope mechanism of preferential flow [J]. Water Resources and Power,2009,27(6): 56-59.(in Chinese)]
[9]孙红月. 含碎石黏性土滑坡的成因机制与防治对策[D]. 杭州:浙江大学,2005.
[SUN H Y. Formation mechanism and control measures of the pebbly clay landslide [D]. Hangzhou:Zhejiang University,2005.(in Chinese)]
[10]JP2李凯,王志兵,韦昌富. 饱和度对风化黄岗岩边坡土体抗剪特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学,2016,37(增刊1):267-273.[LI K,WANG Z B,WEI C F. Effect of saturation on shear strength characteristics of weathered granite slope soil[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2016,37(Sup1): 267-273.(in Chinese)
[11]张永波,张云,陈戈. 花岗岩残积土工程类型划分体系研究[J]. 地球学报, 1997,18(2): 200-204.
[ZHANG Y B,ZHANG Y,CHEN G. The system of engineering category dividing of granite residual soil [J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, 1997,18(2): 200-204.(in Chinese)]
[12]王浩,刘成禹,陈志波. 闽东南花岗岩球状风化不良地质发育特征及其工程地质问题[J]. 工程地质学报, 2011,19(4): 564-569.
[WANG H,LIU C Y,CHEN Z B. Granite spherical weathering features and related engineering geological problems in the southeast area of Fujian province[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2011,19(4): 564-569.(in Chinese)]
[13]刘艳辉,刘丽楠. 基于诱发机理的降雨型滑坡预警研究——以花岗岩风化壳二元结构斜坡为例[J]. 工程地质学报, 2016,24(4): 542-549.
[LIU Y H,LIU L N. Rainfall-induced mechanism based early warning model for slope of dualistic layers in weathered granite area [J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2016,24(4): 542-549.(in Chinese)]
[14]李绍红,朱建东,王少阳,等.考虑降雨类型的基岩型浅层边坡稳定性分析方法[J].水文地质工程地质,2018,45(2):131-135.
[LI S H,ZHU J D,WANG S Y,et al. Stability analysis methods for the bedrock shallow slope considering rainfall types[J].Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2018,45(2):131-135.(in Chinese)]
[15]陈洪江,崔冠英. 花岗岩残积土物理力学指标的概率统计分析[J]. 华中科技大学学报,2001,29(5): 95-97.
[CHEN H J,CUI G Y. Probability statistic analysis of physical mechanical parameters of granite eluvial soil [J]. Journal of Huazhong University of Sciences & Technology,2001,29(5): 95-97.(in Chinese)]

[16]梁仕华,周世宗,张郎. 广州东部地区花岗岩残积土物理力学指标统计分析[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2015,32(1): 29-33.
[LIANG S H,ZHOU S Z,ZHANG L. Statistical analysis of physical and mechanical indexes of granite residual soil in eastern Guangzhou [J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Technology, 2015,32(1): 29-33.(in Chinese)]
[17]张洁,胡金政,马建增. 基于多元分析的花岗岩残积土物理力学性质概率分布模型[J]. 武汉大学学报, 2016,49(5): 648-653.
[ZHANG J,HU J Z,MA J Z. Probabilistic model for mechanical properties of completely decomposed granite based on multivariate analysis [J]. Engineering Journal of Wuhan University, 2016,49(5): 648-653.(in Chinese)]
[18]福建省地质工程勘察院.湖头镇湖上安置区北侧山体地灾点治理工程勘查报告[R]. 2019.
[19]安溪县气象台. 安溪县2010年、2013年、2017年、2018年的降雨日志[R]. 2010,2013,2017,2018.
[20]卓万生. 地质灾害风险管理对策论[J]. 地质灾害与环境保护, 2006,17 (1): 50-53.
[ZHUO W S. Risk management antidote theory for geological disasters [J].Journal of Geological Hazards and Environment Preservation,2006,17 (1): 50-53.(in Chinese)]

相似文献/References:

[1]张莉丽,张辛,王云,等.非常低延展性裂隙岩体REV存在性研究[J].水文地质工程地质,2011,38(5):20.
 ZHANG Li-li,ZHANG Xin,WANG Yun,et al.Determining of the REV for fracture rock mass of very low ductility[J].Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2011,38(2):20.
[2]乔金丽,张义同,许春彦,等.考虑渗流的盾构隧道开挖面稳定性分析[J].水文地质工程地质,2009,36(1):80.
 QIAO Jin-li,ZHANG Yi-tong,XU Chun-yan.Stability analysis of shield tunnel excavation face with the consideration of seepage[J].Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2009,36(2):80.
[3]刘洋,李飞,柴小庆,等.渗流的PFC-CFD耦合细观数值模拟[J].水文地质工程地质,2008,35(2):66.
 LIU Yang,LI Fei,CHAI Xiao-qing,et al.A PFC-CFD coupled model in meso-scale for seepage[J].Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2008,35(2):66.
[4]陈小茜,曾斌,王春晖,等.基于颗粒流理论的层状非均质介质等效渗透系数研究[J].水文地质工程地质,2018,45(02):7.[doi:10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.2018.02.02]
 CHEN Xiaoxi,ZENG Bin,WANG Chunhui,et al.A study of the equivalent hydraulic conductivity of layered heterogeneous media with the particle flow theory[J].Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2018,45(2):7.[doi:10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.2018.02.02]
[5]吴祖松,侯秋萍,马君伟,等.富水隧道幕墙堵水技术研究[J].水文地质工程地质,2019,46(05):65.[doi:10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.2019.05.09]
 WU Zusong,HOU Qiuping,MA Junwei,et al.Research on water blocking technology of curtain walls in water-rich tunnels[J].Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2019,46(2):65.[doi:10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.2019.05.09]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期: 2019-08-28; 修订日期: 2019-12-18
基金项目: ( 国家自然科学基金资助项目“台风暴雨型滑坡多级监测预警系统研究”(41861134011) )
第一作者: (卓万生(1968-),男,高级工程师,主要从事地质灾害防治技术研究与应用。E-mail:axgtjzws@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-03-15